Rick & Brian,

Please find attached the latest projections that have been updated for 
the below changes:
1) Container integration logic: the total kWh quantity per year for each 
customer now pulls the appropriate cell count for both packs and 
containers
2) The hours per pack (costs) and packs per hour (capacity) now 
incorporate the correct conditional logic for each customer
3) Linked constrained equipment resource requirement calculations (for 
phase-based production tied to shifts and staffing, incrementally 
stepping up proportionally to labor shifts per day) and unconstrained 
equipment resource requirement calculations (for theoretical maxes 
-i.e.: 100% equipment production beginning day 1) for battery module 
assembly lines

In cell CN:105 you will find revenue is now $751,700,607.14 compared to 
the previous $861,250,667. This $109,550,059.86 difference is resulting 
from: A) Pack quantity changes from ongoing negotiations with customers, 
B) Changes to anticipated start dates, and, C) The cost for container 
integration labor.

 From our discussions yesterday it makes more sense to have container 
integration pricing as an additional and separate layer. I will add this 
into the next iteration and circle back with container integration 
matrix added. Let me know if any questions or feedback


-- 
Jarrett Brownfield

CFO

Mavrix1: Manufacturing American Autonomy