Rick:

The Jetson was projected out there on the 4th gen.

The 6X flight controller was in the 2nd gen.

The rest of these peripherals and sensors, yes absolutely.

This is very close, but the difference is your client would own the IP.

We'd also be integrating this into airframe platforms, and we'd be looking
domestically at trying to get props and airframes and motors.

That's a very nice site to review and archive and take notes on.

The amount of product they have on there would require more people.  The
way I architected it to you was 2 variants of the ESC (small vs heavy
loads), FCC will have only firmware differences so there's one board, then
anywhere between 2-6 accessory boards at first.

That site is the kind of level you jumped to, you could have your money guy
look at it.



Remember, I have no idea if they have the underlying vision that needs to
happen in 18-24 months to move to something very proprietary to
distinguish the difference between us versus everybody else.  The more you
become a commodity, the less your profit margins and the more competition
you deal with.  If your competition doesn't have the same restrictions of
domestic-only, it's not a fair fight.

The act of saying the goal at the end of the day is to be strictly domestic
has to have inherent value because that's a big pair of handcuffs.  I know
that'll be tossed out the window at some point, but as of right now you've
told me that is the goal.

-- Tom



On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:41 AM Rick <rick@mavrix.one> wrote:

> So simply speaking…
>
> Is this what you’re projecting to build first:
> https://arkelectron.com/product/ark-jetson-pab-carrier/
>
> Then the rest of these things…
> https://arkelectron.com
>
> FC, ESC, etc…
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>